Why you don’t need Feminism

I read a post by Sarah Moon, “Feminism Fest: I need feminism because there is no love without justice”, and was deeply troubled by her claim to need feminism. In short, she stated feminism was a “movement that fights for justice for women,” and this cause gave her the ability to love the men in and around her life. Feminism freed her from her fear of oppressive men who “continually hurt” her because it brought justice, which in turn brought her love.

The problem with feminism is that it is a cause people turn to rather than turning to God and His Word. God preserves the rights of the oppressed. God preserves for the rights of women. He is against rape and abuse and does not blame victims for the sins of the criminal (Duet. 22:25). Women want equality, justice, and freedom, but that cannot be found through any human cause.

The Lord God Almighty is the God of justice, the only one who can and will free you to love.

Now there is nothing wrong with equality, justice, or freedom, but feminism is incapable of providing these things. 

Take equality- feminists strive to make men and women equal in society with equal jobs and equal pay. They want to prove to the world that women are just as good as men, declaring from their pede

stals, “Anything you can do, I can do better!” In this quest for equality, however, they actually say the very opposite. Equal becomes synonomous with identical. of proving that women are just as valuable as men, they prove men are superior, and all women should strive to be like men, getting the same education they get, doing all the jobs they do. This is not equality.

True equality comes from Christ: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”- Galations 3:28″ (emphasis mine)

If two things are equal in value and worth, do they have to be the same. Is salt any better than pepper? Of course not. Their differences benefit one another; they do not make one superior to the other. Pepper alone does not add sufficient flavor to a meal- it needs salt. But salt alone has no kick, no spiciness in itself- it needs pepper. Why do you think they’re always seen together?

Feminism cannot provide justice, either.

Feminists are people, human beings with sinful hearts, just like everyone else, and as such, they are powerless to give anyone justice. Yes, they can raise awareness of the injustices in our society; they can protest; they can demand justice. But in the end, they are only calling attention to the injustices, not stopping them.

There is only one who can bring justice: “Touching the Almighty, we cannot find him out: he is excellent in power, and in judgement, and in plenty of justice: he will not afflict.” (emphasis mine)

It is He, the Almighty, who can bring justice, because He has the power to bring justice, and delights in being a “refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble.” (Psalms 9:9) On Him, whose habitation is of justice and judgement (Psa. 89:14), we can completely trust to bring justice to afflicted. We should not trust mere people to do that which God promises  to do Himself (Psa. 146:7)

And feminist justice will not free you to love.

Feminists hope the justice and equality their cause brings, will free them from fear and hatred and allow them to love. But since a cause cannot deliver true justice, hatred and fear still imprison souls. Love finds no soil good enough to blossom amongst anger, anxiety, suspicion.

The reason for this: love is not the result of freedom, but rather means to be freed. “There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear:” (1 John 4:18)  Freedom does not enable you to love.  Love is what frees you, not the other way around.

The God of the Bible is THE God of love (1 John 4:8). When He saves you through His Son’s sacrifice on the cross, He gives you the freedom to love those who hate you, bless those who curse you and pray for those who persecute you (Matt. 5:44). In fact, He commands His people to love their enemies . He commands this because of the love He showered over undeserving sinners, His own enemies, in sending Christ to save our souls from eternal hell. (Rom. 8:8,10; 1 John 4:10) This is why we can love others- because of God’s love.    

No one needs feminsim, or any other cause. The Lord of heaven and earth, the only just God, the one who can free your soul, He is sufficient. He brings justice to the oppressed and freedom to the captive. Through His love, because of His love, you can love.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What if I was raped?

Women’s rights advocates in favor of a pregnant woman’s right to choose whether to keep their “fetus” refer to it as pro choice. “Choose”- such a positive term that seems to throw a glimmering light over the subject, as if the right to abort a baby were some revolutionary expression of personal freedom. Who would be against freedom or human rights in this modern era of democracy? Maybe being pro-choice would be considered taboo in the middle ages, but this is the 21st Century. Our thinking has evolved beyond that medieval thinking.

Many argue the baby is a fetus, not yet a human being, making the extermination perfectly amoral. Others say aborting the baby under certain conditions is the humane thing to do.

How easy exercising your freedom to choose would be if it weren’t choosing between life and death. But a fetus is just another term for an unborn baby. It has a heartbeat. At a very early stage of pregnancy, (around 6 weeks or so) the “fetus'” heart begins to pump blood to its already forming eyes, ears, arms and legs. When the heart stops beating, doctors declare a person dead. Reviving the heart brings them back to life. Yet somehow, the beating heart of an unborn baby is not evidence of life for many.

However, not all pro-choice advocates deny an unborn baby is anything less. Some argue it is rather the quality of life the baby might have after birth which makes it acceptable to abort. After all, if the baby were disabled in any way, or the surroundings were not suitable to a certain standard, why should the baby live? Society often considers those with disabilities as outcasts, and no good-hearted person would want to subject a person to a life like that. No, it is much better to kill them. And if the child’s future was destined to be “bad” by your standard of a good life, there is no reason to give them a chance at life. It’s your choice, right?

But what about rape?

There are some who are not pro-choice, except under certain conditions, such as rape. For a young woman who was viciously attacked, violated in unspeakable ways, surely if she concieved, abortion would be justified. But the unjust killing of an unborn baby is never justifiable. It’s murder.

Then I considered the question: What if I was raped? My first thought was, “Abortion is wrong. Period.” But I seriously contemplated what and how I would feel if something like that happened to me. I thought about it as if it did happen, and as I did so, I realized how angry I would be. Angry at the man who did it; angry at the child for being half of him; I felt so much anger for something that hadn’t actually happened. I realized how much hate I would have for that baby, as well as how much I would want to get rid of it, and I was shocked.

Absolutely shocked.

After everything I had thought about abortion, after all the judgement I had poured out on  the pro-choice campaign, to know that’s how I would feel was heart breaking.

Even so, my feelings, or anyone’s feelings, do not change the fact that murder is wrong. “You shall not murder,” (Exodus 20:13) is the sixth of the Ten Commandments. The evil another person does to you does not justify murder. Killing an unborn fetus is the murder of a baby. Murder, whether it’s out of “good intentions” and a “merciful” heart, or out of pure hatred, you can’t reason away the evil of it. No arguement could ever be convincing enough to condone it.

You see, abortion is not a matter of women’s rights or the freedom of choice. It’s not an issue that was morally wrong in the past, but changed as society modernized. It’s a matter of life and death for an unborn child who should have the same right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” as it’s mother does. Circumstances do not change basic truths of right and wrong. And the killing of unborn babies is wrong.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment